Simagic Pedal Comparison: What Sets the P1000 and P2000 Apart?
Table of Contents:
Ah, yes, the classic "what's the difference between Simagic's P1000 and P2000 Pedals?" question. While I'm not an expert by any means, there are a few noticeable differences between the two sets, which I'll explain in this blog post.
Before diving into their differences, it's worth highlighting what the Simagic P1000 and P2000 Pedals have in common. Both models include throttle plates, integrated heel stops, and offer the option to add a clutch pedal. They’re also available in either 2-pedal or 3-pedal configurations, giving you flexibility based on your setup and driving preferences.
The difference between these two pedal sets boils down to preference, customization, feel, and a couple of small, yet noteworthy features that may or may not matter depending on how you drive.
Pedal Throw and Feel
One of the more immediate differences you'll notice is that the Simagic P1000 Pedals have less available throw. For most people, it isn't a huge dealbreaker, but the shorter the clutch throw, the more responsive it tends to feel, especially in cars where quick shifts and fast pedal transitions matter.
If you're driving GT or open-wheel cars, the reduced travel might be advantageous. But if you're after a more road-car-like experience with long, progressive pedal travel, the P2000's additional throw might be more suited to your style. It depends on your own preferences.
Inversion Capabilities
The P1000 Pedals can be inverted. If you don't know what that means, it's a way to mount your pedals upside-down in order to replicate the pedal layout of certain race cars or custom rigs. Many say the ability to invert the pedals adds realism, but others disagree completely. If you're running a standard rig, this feature may not be a factor in determining which pedal set you want to buy.
While the P2000 Pedals cannot be inverted, they still offer a solid and realistic feel for most racing scenarios. Their fixed upright design is sturdy, well-engineered, and works great in traditional pedal mounting positions.
Brake Mechanisms: Elastometers vs. Springs
I would say the most noticeable difference between the P1000 Pedals and P2000 Pedals is the brake mechanisms. This is because the P1000 uses elastometers for brake resistance, while the P2000 uses springs. Depending on the material used, the pressure and rebound will feel different. Some prefer the more progressive feeling of the elastometers, and others like the sharper, more mechanical feel of the P2000 springs.
However, P1000 users can purchase third-party springs for a very reasonable price. This gives room for sim racers to experiment with what they feel is best for them.
Customization
If you enjoy customizing your sim rig, the P1000 pedals might be the right choice for you because they allow LED light installations and third-party mods with ease.
One of the standout features of the P1000 set is its high modding potential. From adjustable pedal faces to various elastomer or spring combinations, you can really dial in the feel you want. The open design also makes it easy to tinker, swap parts, or even 3D print custom components if you're feeling adventurous.
Key Takeaways and Summary
In short, the Simagic P1000 and P2000 pedals both share a solid foundation. Both offer throttle plates, heel stops, and optional clutch pedals. They can either come in 2- or 3-pedal configurations.
But when it comes to feel, flexibility, and customization, the differences start to show. The P1000 offers a shorter pedal throw, inversion capability, elastomer-based braking, and greater modding potential. Meanwhile, the P2000 delivers a more traditional, spring-loaded brake feel and a fixed design that's ready to perform right out of the box. Ultimately, choosing between the two comes down to your personal preferences, driving style, and how deep you want to go into customization.
https://www.instagram.com/apexsimracing/?hl=en
Leave a comment